During the debate between the parties, the state prosecutor asked that the defendant be given a sentence of six months more than the court imposed on him, without a fine and with a restriction of freedom for one year. The court recognized the circumstances mitigating the defendant’s punishment, being a minor at the time of the crime, actively contributing to the detection and investigation of the crime, admitting guilt and sincere repentance for the crime, committing a crime for the first time, positive characteristics at the place of residence and study, the presence of chronic diseases in the teenager, multiple victories in various Olympiads.